Reply all function maybe shouldn't include the sender account?
complete
Etienne Lemay
complete
Etienne Lemay
in progress
Etienne Lemay
closed
Etienne Lemay
Hey Ed. It must’ve been because the message was sent to more than one of your addresses. In that case, when replying the address used as the FROM isn’t included in the other fields, but we’re not filtering any other addresses even if you own it.
Reasons being the other address could be a group (that’s also in your aliases) and we can’t be sure that it doesn’t need to be included. It could also be an email account that’s shared with you, but could still want to leave it in the fields.
Don’t hesitate to email us the conversation link if you feel like the above doesn’t apply.
Ed Lyons
Etienne Lemay: So I think what you're saying applies, but just want to check - it is because I have an alias setup as my default send from address. So likely people are emailing one address and I'm replying from a slightly different address, therefore the one it is sent to is being included. Sound about right?
Etienne Lemay
Ed Lyons: Aaah, yes exactly. I guess in your case that’s likely to happen very often 🤔
I still think that not including the other “known addresses” could be unexpected in some cases, but we could make it a setting. When enabled, any addresses considered yours would be ignored. Would that be useful for you?
Ed Lyons
Etienne Lemay: Definitely. For now I've disabled the alias and reverted to using my old email address as I generally reply all to every email and gets annoying having to remove my other email address every time!
Etienne Lemay
Ed Lyons: Gotcha! Consider it done for the next release.